How a software bugs can cause high costs to the project

Posted: June 20, 2018 by Natalya Rahmany

Software testing has become a crucial part of the project management lifecycle, significantly impacting project costs.

In this post, I’ll delve into how software bugs can lead to increased expenses for a project.

While most software companies now maintain a dedicated testing department, some still question the need for a QA unit and rely more on their development teams.

The effectiveness of testing is often measured by the ratio of testers to developers, varying from 1 tester per 7 developers to a more stringent 1 tester per 3-4 developers.

This variance in tester-to-developer ratios also reflects the variability in budget allocation for thesoftware testingdepartment within projects.

Join the Productive Hut newsletter

Subscribe to get our latest posts and tips!

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time!

Undetected software bugs during testing can lead to substantial costs once users encounter them while using the software.

Let’s delve into why this happens!

  1. When customers encounter issues in production, it not only tarnishes the product’s reputation but also impacts the overall brand image in the long run, signaling lower quality.
  2. Issues surfacing in production or lower environments cause a flurry of hotfixes and patches, diverting the development team’s focus from roadmap development to issue resolution.
  3. Systems with high-risk factors necessitate more in-depth testing compared to those with lower impact potential in case of failure.

Consider critical defense or medical systems; a software bug in such systems could have life-threatening consequences. Hence, detecting bugs promptly is crucial.

The V-Model advises initiating testing during the requirements phase, while the agile model suggests parallel testing with development, significantly reducing project costs.

For instance, in financial systems, miscalculating stock prices could result in millions of dollars in losses due to incorrect stock sales and purchases.

Similarly, GPS systems with erroneous directions pose high risks, leading to customer distrust and subsequent sales losses.

Determining the depth and intensity of software testing should align with the anticipated risk of failure, emphasizing detailed risk assessments in project initiation.

To ensure comprehensive testing, testers must align with production requirements and execute systematic tests, allowing for the discovery of complex faults with minimal effort.

If you found this post helpful, share your thoughts in the comments, detailing how it benefited you.

Join the Productive Hut Family and become part of our community!”

Join the Productive Hut newsletter

Subscribe to get our latest posts and tips!

I will never give away, trade or sell your email address. You can unsubscribe at any time!


  • software testing February 16, 2019 at 1:36 am

    Greate post. Keep posting such kind of info on your page.
    Im really impressed by your blog.
    Hello there, You’ve performed a fantastic
    job. I’ll definitely digg it and for my part suggest to my friends.

    I am sure they’ll be benefited from this website.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

I accept that my given data and my IP address is sent to a server in the USA only for the purpose of spam prevention through the Akismet program.More information on Akismet and GDPR.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: